[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • Pointed, "wedge" shaped loop



    Walter & Group.....

    Here are some comments on how to make the pointed-at-the-top ("wedge") shaped loop : -

     

    This was Paul Arden's message:

    Hi Gordy,
    interesting question! Ultimately I think a pointed overhead morphing loop can only come down to power application (everything comes down to power application!). When teaching emphasising drag and a relaxed grip, for me, has always taken a rounded loop caster to a pointy loop caster - and I personally throw round loops by keeping my hand tense throughout the stroke. There may be other methods and I would be interested to hear and try them.
     
    Incidentally I think the point at the bottom/rat's snout loop that Guy was discussing is often a tilted wedge shape loop. Throw a high angled backcast and aim at the target on the forward cast and the point appears at the bottom (also with a fast rod) - same loop shape, different trajectory.
     
    Cheers, Paul
     
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Also, from Paul:
     
    SLP during line acceleration, ie to RSP. I think it's [almost] as simple as that.
     
    I'm also sending a pic just after line release that was taken a month or so ago. What's interesting about this pic is that the loop starts off round, however it morphs into an sharp wedge shape loop. I learned something this particular weekend, which I should have worked out years ago, in that the amount of overhang should be matched to the tip deflection away from the trajectory of the line. For example this line is an Mastery ED, when that loop is all overhang, completely leaving the head in the air, the loops morph dramatically sharper. With this stroke that happens with an 86ft carry (flyline to line hand). Up until then I had always figured work out your maximum carry and then pull back a little bit - which is a quite literally a backwards way of doing it.
     
    Cheers,
    Paul
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    You will recall this one (along with attachments & link showing drawing of these loop shapes) from Guy Manning :
     

    Gordy,

     

    This link:  http://i112.photobucket.com/albums/n163/grhen/cast/040cf499.gif  is a line drawing of 3 basic loop shapes.

    A = Upper pointed leading edge

    B = Lower pointed leading edge

    C = Round leading edge

     

    To begin with when, all 3 of these shapes can be formed without hauling. So to attribute a late or early haul to their formation is inaccurate don’t you think?

     

    Woody Woodland and I played around with this one day for A and B. We came to the conclusion that using fast action rods we are going to get A. The only way we were able to mimic B was to use a soft rod and attempt to finish the stroke with the rod tip moving into RSP in a downward trajectory. If we used the same rod and finished with the rod tip moving into RSP at a horizontal or greater angle then we would get A. We couldn’t get the fast auctioned rods to make the B shape. Again these tests were made without hauling the line.

     

    Years ago at Long Beach Casting Club I would judge fly accuracy games and noted the different loop shapes (which were easy to see from the perspective of being in front of the caster and near the target). In those games few people would haul once they got the fly to the target distance. Both of these shapes were apparent to me back then and I only saw shape C with newer casters who had not achieved tight loops and good stops.

     Guy

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    You may remember my comment that I can sometimes do it with an upward and outward thrust made at the conclusion of the stroke. With me, it happens so fast that I am, frankly, not certain whether I'm doing it as I come to a stop, slightly before, or at or near RSP. 

    I went out, today and worked on this.  I simply couldn't do it with a soft or medium action rod.  Worked best for me when I delayed rotation by first using a long translation of my rod.

    Worked much better if I did it with a small length of running line out of the rod tip (overhang).  I did even better with a shooting head and very thin shooting running line.

    If there is something in the fly casting literature which tells us just how to do it, I've missed it. 

           Gordy

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    From Wallace Henderson:

    An interesting extension of this discussion might be the way I saw Tim Rajeff make back casts ... wrist rotation first followed by a translational move to limit downward counter flex and improve loop shape and efficiency of the back cast.   As you can see from Arden's sequence, the lower leg of the loop is pulled up by the top leg as the loop unrolls.  Tim told me he believes limiting that inefficiency on the back cast is important to distance casting.  While it can be reduced with an upward thrust of the tip, he believes it better to finish with a translational move to reduce downward counterflexcr.  Another way to think about it is that finishing the back cast stroke with a translational move may generate less line speed but delivers a superior loop from which a strong traditional forward cast can be made.  
     
    By the way, you didn't post the portion of Arden's web site that describes the relaxing of the hand at RSP to help form the point.  Maybe his thinking has evolved?
     
    W.
       `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
    Wallace .... No, I didn't.  May well be a factor.                 Gordy
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    This, just in, from Steve Rajeff.  We've noted that he is really consistent in forming this shape loop :

    Hi Gordon,

    I believe the pointed loop forms due to the slight forward extension at the moment the rod is nearly unloaded.

    It is helped by a stiff rod to line balance. Nobody has the reflex to know to do it at a specific instant, but it is a feeling acquired through practice. I also think the wrist turn over combined with the forward extension helps to form the point. If you follow the concept of the straight line path of the tip idea combined with high line speed to the point of release, there is likely going to be a pointed loop. Another contributing element to the pointed loop is the rod taper. It is easier to get the pointed loop with a fast taper rod, vs a slow action.

    Steve

     ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

    Let's pick these messages apart and distill out the, "meat" :

    1.) Seems that a stiff (fast action) rod is best, and may be necessary.

    2.) Extension of the rod hand ("thrust", "stab" ... or whatever you wish to call it) somewhere near or at the end of the stroke seems to be one way of doing it.

    3.) The exact timing of this maneuver may be critical, but no one has really defined this.  No study data.

    4.) Probably works better when casting with at least some thin running line out of the tip top.

    5.) Trajectory ("launch angle") of lower back cast and higher forward cast may help.

    6.)  Doubtless takes lots of, "trial and error" practice with good feedback from a knowledgable observer standing off to the side.

    7.)  May work better when casting shooting heads with very thin shooting (running) line.

    8.) Can be done without any haul at all.

    9.)  Extension of the haul, if used, may play a part if used to change the resistance of the rod leg to increase it relative to that of the fly leg.

    10.) May be that anything which helps to damp counterflex can help.

    11.) Relaxing the grip at or near RSP may help.

     

    Factors not gleaned from the messages but which may pertain:

    1.) I suspect one needs a nearly straight line path of the rod tip as for all small loops.

    2.) Probably helps to have high line speed.

    Gordy

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Post "autopsy" message from Gary Eaton:

    Gordy,
     
     This is interesting Theory - no way to prove anything so, any comment gets some consideration but nothing is definitive. Jim Laing and I discussed this on the phone and I have a couple of comments.
    1) The rod handle is among the least favorable places from which to observe loop shape. Lou Stevens Improving Your Flycasting illustrates some of the optical disinformation involved in estimating trajectory (launch angle) and extrapolating to shape of loops seems reasonable.
    2) In support of the above; when testing  or teaching someone, don't we all try to get multiple angles? Isn't loop size and shape easier to analyze from the side view at some distance that allows the entire cast to be viewed at once? That's what I see in the casting videos sold commercially to make their points. Look at the sequences in Jaworowski's The Cast and many other captured images in print and on line. These are only one dimensional views and should not be used to interpret the full dynamic of loop shape nor cast mechanics which are seldom merely two-dimensional. The two-dimensional drawing is a simplification utilized for convenience.
    3) Loops Morph! This was brought home to me in a clip from Lasse Karlsson (new CBOG) on a distance cast where the loop started round, grew a counterflex "airplane wing' or "boat hull" shape then pulled the rod leg up to straight as the fly leg began to have less mass than the rod leg. The "boat hull" shape was flatter on top  but somewhat pointed and the end shape was more of a "rat snout" until the leader kicked over. It was on line and I enjoyed an  electronic discussion with Lasse regarding my observations.
    Guy Manning's observations are valid as observations.  I contend that there is likely a lot more in play than we have elucidated.
     
    My bias seems to be heading toward the following theories:
    1) Much of the rod leg characteristics are the result of post- STOP rod tip movement
    2) Loop size and shape are connected in the acceleration to STOP tip movement both vertically and horizontally. Loop size is the result of deviation from SLP above horizontal during the rotational phase of acceleration combined with uncompensated counter-flex after STOP. Grunde Lovoll's Clip contributed by Jason Borger gives a powerful slow motion proof of this comparing the T&T Paradigm Rod with the Sage  TCR. I accepted this point when conveyed to me from Chuck Easterling, CBOG, and registered it for permanence with analysis of the clip described.
    3) Some dynamic of the deceleration, rotation, counter-flex is also critical. This has not adequately been analyzed but is being pursued by the casting intelligencia including Bruce Richards CBOG, Nole Perkins, PhD, Jason Borger CBOG, et al.
    4) Rod action and recovery has impact but it is not known whether this can be fully compensated through altered technique of delivery.
    5) Line type and taper has some effect but it is not fully evaluated.
    6) Haul application and timing may have an effect but, dissecting the component that is line acceleration from timing of haul duration is complex and likely will remain unresolved for quite some time, especially given the undetermined role of the multiple variables.
    7) Most analysis currently underway applies two-dimensional models. Current published work attempts to generate a true profile but, the simultaneously acquired 90-degree view is not  presented. Without this coincident visual comparison, three-dimensional inferences are difficult to substantiate. Wrong assumptions and intepretations may be professed with incomplete (too few angles) analyses.
     
    Though stimulating, this material will not be completely resolved before my MCCI. This is the level at which I will respond if questioned. Thanks to Guy Manning MCCI and Gordy Hill, CBOG -  I can stop obsessing on what I don't know because no one else does either.
     
    Respectfully,
     
     Gary Eaton
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
    Gary....   I look at your message as a sensible way to look at it.  Good work !
     
    Gordy
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~