Walter & Group..........
From Troy Miller:
Got them, THANKS! I don't know what happened, but about a month ago, I
suddenly became unable to open Gordy's attachments. Might be some kind
of setting that he's got on his computer, cuz I have no problem opening
anyone elses' files...
So a couple of things jump out at me. First, I have to ask how y'all
went about synchronizing the three different sensors' outputs. Did you
have to phase shift them or how did the recording all work? *****Just
had to adjust the offsets to get them all reading on the same scale.
I can't help but wonder about the significant difference between the
haul (both onset of, and slope of acceleration) on your back and fore
casts. Is this purely a style thing, or would you guess that most
casters would cast this way? I will try to check this on my own casting
next time I practice, cuz I'd believe that mine would be really
symmetric between back and fore cast hauls. But maybe that's just
wishful thinking? I could see there being a difference on the FIRST
backcast haul, since you're lifting stationary line, sometimes from the
water. *****I expected mine to be more similar too, but not surprised
that they aren't identical. I think this has to do with simple body
mechanics, it is easier to make the back haul than the front, the hands
are pulling apart from each other right from the start. Also, especially
on my back casts I try to minimize rod motion and optimize the haul.
You'll note that rod peak speed is significantly less on the back cast,
but haul speed is greater. That is just part of my style, and also part
of the reason that my back loops are typically better than the front.
I'd love to see how the character of these curves changes with different
lengths of line out. In other words, about 10 casting cycles, shooting
5 feet on each stroke. Go from 50 to 100 feet while hauling. I wonder
if the nature of the haul changes, for the same caster? I'd think mine
does. *****I'm sure it would change some, but suspect not as much as
you'd think. Hopefully we'll have a more robust device in the future
that will allow that kind of study, we have some ideas.... Bruce
Regards -- TAM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Michael Jones:-
I just re-read everyones answers/comments on hauling, and there is a
lot of 'belief' that hauling early is used to lift the line off the
water. I have mixed emotions about the loosely used term 'haul', and
wonder if the haul could be further broken-down much like a casting
stroke where the casting stroke has translation (get the rod-tip &
line moving in a direction) and rotation (accelerate the straight line
in the direction of a target).
Yes, I use some pulling of the line hand help in lifting line during
the pick-up, but let's not confuse that with "when we should start the
haul" once everything is in the air and balanced.
AND, if the casting stroke encompasses translation and rotation, maybe
hauling encompasses something similar in that we are accomplishing
several objectives with what appears to be one 'move', when we really
are: removing slack, increasing line speed, then accelerating the line
by increasing the 'pull's' speed during the rotational
phase...thoughts?
Is the early part of the haul (during the initial part of the cast) a
'bastard's strip', when the final 'pull' is the actual effective
'haul'?
Michael Jones
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Michael... I think you are correct on both counts. First that there is sometimes mis use of the word, "haul"....especially when lifting line from the water where one can use a so-called, "water haul" or, "tension cast" with or without a pull with the line hand.
I, also, think there may be merit in trying to break down the haul into elements .... though I can't think of a good way to do that at the moment. Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Michael Jones:
Gordy~
I agree with your conclusions about this topic. There is plenty of
room for more discussion and some clearer definitions regarding
hauling. For MCCI candidates (at least from my experience):
"I'd like to think we can keep our minds open to plausable theory.
Personal bias and different opinions will remain and provide the very
flavor for what makes fly casting an art."
-this sounds good although personal bias & plausable theory are
concepts that seem(ed) to fall short to some testers (Wulff School)
and in a Masters Examination. I am interested in your short answer
for: "when should the haul begin", just for the record.
I am also interested in hearing more from Bruce and Noel about
tracking the line hand path during hauling, and what they are noticing
with changing the position/travel of that hand to improve efficiency.
Maybe you would forward that request to see if they are playing with
that.
Thank you for all your work here, I am getting a lot out of your &
everyones input :))
Michael Jones
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Michael: My short answer is: Under most circumstances the haul should start near the start of the stroke.
I happen to know that Bruce and Noel have not yet done any formal studies on haul hand tracking as yet.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
>
From Scott Swartz........