[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
Tension, Cont'd
- Subject: Tension, Cont'd
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:05:55 -0500
Walter & Group.........
From Carl McNeil:
Hi Gordy
This is always a great discussion! - can't wait till you guys get onto loop
shape and morph - there's a hornets nest!
There has actually been quite a lot of work done around these
topics 'with regard to physical determination' as you put it. With regard
to "to measure is to know' I couldn't agree more. However the challenge is
that the physics and mathematical formulas that outline these
principles are exceedingly complex - far too complex for this kid
anyhow. Happy to post some links if you are desirous ...and want to be sent
to sleep.
Some of the most recent, revealing and interesting work has been performed
by Grunde Løvoll
of Norway (unfortunately his paper is
in Norwegian)
There's also
an excellent theses by Mike Hendry’, “Measurement and Simulation of
Fly Casting Dynamics”, from the University of California Davis in 1999. Wich
I've only read bits of.
More recent work on loop morph
and propagation has been done by Gordon Judd - of the UK
I believe.
Of course the man to ask
to talk to is our own Bruce Richards (and Noel of course) - what Bruce
doesn't know on the subject probably isn't worth knowing.
My old mate Mac Brown has this
pretty well summed up too.
Anyway. Tension is present
throughout the system and must be in order for a loop to form and propagate
forward. My current and somewhat limited understanding is: The tension in
the line at the top and bottom of the loop is related to the centripetal force
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centripetal_force)
required to balance the v.^2/r ( keplers 3rd law)
Earlier I stated that
I believed tension in top and bottom legs would be the same - I
now see that this is incorrect - as there will
be frictional loses as the line passes around the loop
face as it propagates forward.
To answer your question "Do you think the momentum
of the loop may be pulling the rod leg out as one shoots line
?"
Yes and no - but more of a no ;-))
However, You are not simply "throwing a mass of line"
as Michael states. The simplest way
to demonstrate this that I know off is to perform either one
of the following simple experiments. A good one for students too
Take 90 ft of fly line - bunch it up and try to throw it 30 meters.
How far will it go? - Line mass remains the same as in when it
is cast.
Alternately, take 90ft (or whatever) of fly line. Lay it out on the
grass behind you then try to pull and throw it forward in
javelin fashion. How far does it go. Again mass is the same.
As pertains to this particular discussion - A big part of the magic that
allows us to create a loop and thus cast a flyline, is the
tension present in the system; primarily present due to the
fact that out line is tethered - even when shooting.
Of course there are many more magical properties that allow this
to happen - but your topic is currently tension :-)
Carl
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carl...
Well.... if I have that 90' of line straight out on the grass behind me, I
can easily throw the whole thing....IF I DO IT WITH A FLY ROD. To do it in
javelin-throw fashion using my hand/arm is impossible. REASON:
I can only get my hand holding the line to move at a maximum of 2-3
M/sec.,(Average throuhout my hand stroke only about 1M/sec) so the velocity
of the line is no greater even though the mas has not changed. Using a 9'
fly rod, I can generate a tip and therefore a line velocity several times
greater because of the lever effect of the long rod. With lack of velocity
and the mass remaining unchanged, I cannot get enough tension to yield
sufficient momentum.
If the line is bunched up, then even using the fly rod, I cannot throw it
very far : REASON: Almost all my effort will go into straightening out all
that slack lying on the ground and very little if any energy will be left to
throw the line. You are correct in that the mass is unchanged except that
the mass of any amount of line left unmoved on the ground as I take up slack
would have to be subtracted. Again, with all that slack, I'll never get
enough tension to impart my energy to the fly line.
Jason Borger has worked with Grunde Lovol of Norway .... he has sent us one
of his papers translated into English. A few months ago, I included
it in one of our attachments. I'm aware of Gordy Judd's work.
Seems he's been trying to disprove some of the conclusions derived from work
with the Casting Analyzer.
If you can let me know the journal in which Mike Hendry's paper was
published, I'll get it and study it.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comment:
I've posed these questions to Bruce Richards :-
Bruce....
A couple of questions have
come up during the deliberations of our Master Study Group. Wonder if you
could help :-
1.) Do you think that
the TENSIONS in the upper (fly) leg and the lower (rod) leg remain equal as the
loop unfurls ?
2.) Has this actually
been measured ?
3.) Is it the
momentum of the unrolling / traveling LOOP or that of the lower (rod) leg which
is responsible for, "pulling" the fly line out of the rod guides and tip top
when shooting line ?
4.) Can you give us
the specific reference to Mike Hendry's, "Measurement And Simulation of Fly
Casting Dynamics". (We're told the work was done at the U. of Cal.,
'99.)
Gordy