[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
[SPAM] TRAJECTORY, MORE
- Subject: [SPAM] TRAJECTORY, MORE
- Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 20:41:54 -0400
Walter
& Group:
Some banter on
TRAJECTORY to make us think:-
Howdy
Gordy
When you cast side arm and your rod is horizontal or
near Horizontal is your loop in a vertical orientations or a horizontal? I
can cast from a side arm with a Vertical loop plane or
horizontal.
Now if we are talking trajectory are we not still talking the line from loop to
loop?
Weather
the path is raising from the back loop to the front loop or How much it is
rising would still be the trajectory of the cast. You might even have a downward
trajectory. It is the angle from horizontal weather up or down is still
the trajectory of the cast. Is it not?
ol
Al
```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
ol
Al...
No it is not the angle
from horizontal, up or down, as I see it. Mac Brown does see it that
way. I look at it, not with respect to the loop which can be vertical or
horizontal even when casting in the horizontal rod plane, but that trajectory is
related to the rod plane itself.
Depends upon how one
wishes to define it, you see. I suspect that I'm in the minority on this
one though it helps me in my thinking of casting mechanics. None of the
other authors in the writings I've checked make a statement of relationship of
trajectory or line plane to anything......but leave us with the assumption that
it is related to the ground or water simply because they are all depicting it
with the caster using a vertical rod plane. I find it stimulating to
challenge this line of thinking.
If you look at it the
way Mac Brown does (relating it to the ground), then one can cast with a
strictly horizontal rod plane and still have a high line back cast and a low
line forward cast or vice versa, or both could be level with respect to the
ground. That's probably the least complicated way to look at
it.
Problem is, as with many
casting terms, that there are multiple definitions depending upon the
definer. This is why we've been working so hard with our CBOG Glossary
committee ...... to come up with an, "official" FFF glossary of terms so we end
up all using the same language.
We could, for example,
use the term, "line plane" in relating to the ground, and, "trajectory" to
relate to the rod plane....or vice versa.....or we could agree to treat
them as synonyms and relate them to either.
Gordy