Hi Gordy,
I read Walters paper with interest. The only thing
I might be inclined to disagree with is his assumption that perfectly constant
acceleration would not be desireable. He asserts that we intentionally don't
accelerate constantly to avoid "kick back", and other problems. I don't think
this is the case. I've tried very hard to accelerate in a perfectly constant
way, but have not been able to do it. And I've never seen it in others either,
but did see a 1.2, which is nearly perfect, and many casts under 2.0, which is
very close to constant.
To think that big problems would occur if the
acceleration was slightly more constant isn't entirely logical in my mind, nor
has it been clearly explained why this would happen. Noel doesn't see how this
would cause problems either. *
But this is all probably just a theoretical issue,
I'm not sure that humans can achieve perfectly constant acceleration... If I
ever get to that point I'll be very proud, even if it does cause problems in the
cast and we're proven wrong!
Bruce
* Noel Perkins, Professor of Physics, University of Michigan.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bruce....
Seems we'd
need some sort of casting robot programmed from the outset to yield perfect
constant acceleration to help prove the point... though I suspect you and Noel
are correct.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gordy, we have the robot, but haven't used it in a
while and have not tried programming constant accel. into it. Great idea though,
we should try that!
Bruce
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~