Walter & Group...
I think it is important that Master candidates know the vast differences between the CCI exam which they have all taken and the Master exam which they approach.
We started this Study Group years ago with the principle purpose of increasing the quality of performance for Master candidates. Within 2 years, the pass rate improved.
One of the principal reasons for candidates failing the MCCI exam in the past has been inadequate preparation due to the lack of appreciation of the scope and breadth of the exam compared to the one they have already taken.
Kat Wagner speaks from experience as a "master" teacher of music as well as an accomplished fly caster and instructor. She is the first to answer our question. :
Denise,
Essentially, I see the two tests differences as being in the level of casting skill and depth of knowledge. More distance and more manipulation of the line on the masters test as well as depth of knowledge in the areas of teaching, casting mechanics, fishing, equipment, and etiquette. Being able to analyze casting in more detail and being able to fix casting problems with more tools in the instructors toolbox too.
Best,
Dusty
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Regards Denise's CI and MCI question. This is a question I've been asking recently and I think the most succinct way of putting it has been Chuck Easterling's answer, is that to pass a CI you ask yourself "how confident would I feel about paying this guy to teach a friend/girlfriend to cast?" and with the MCI, "how would I feel about the candidate mentoring a friend through his MCI?" Pretty subjective I know, but it works for me.
The most comprehensive answers was yours and Bruce's - I think all MCI candidates should read them.
http://www.sexyloops.co.uk/cgi-bin/theboard_07/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST&f=3&t=12201&st=#entry217636Cheers and thanks,
Paul=
Hi
Gordy,
Question: "What is the purpose of fly casting?"
Liam
Duffy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Liam.....
You strike at the heart of the beast !
I see many "purposes" for fly casting.
The original purpose was to deliver a fly to a fish. Other methods of delivery were fine when the lure or bait was heavy enough to cast... not so with an almost weightless "lure".
From there we range on to other purposes all the way from the atheletic accomplishments of tournament casters, through the physics achievements of those who cast with measurement devices and on to those who delight with the wonderful feeling brought by deliciously smooth casts.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Troy Miller comments on the actions of parabolic fly rods :
I haven?t read Joan?s
comments regarding parabolics, but anyone who?s suffered through one of my
bamboo casting presentations will confirm my disdain for rods tapered as such.
I?m not saying that parabolics are bad. I?m saying that to enjoy the
benefits of a parabolic, the caster must devote time to learning how to load and
unload it consistently. Parabolics don?t seem to perform optimally for
casters who use a different rod every day. Rods which load more
progressively are highly predictable, giving confidence to the caster that what
he puts in, he will get out. If you follow Bill Gammel?s ?add one foot?
exercise with a progressive, you?ll know what is coming next on each small
extension of line. With a truly parabolic taper, you will get a surprise
at some point when you just add one more foot of flyline -- but suddenly the
load point jumps 2 or 3 feet down the rod. That can be quite unnerving for
the attentive, logical caster. Once you get yourself tuned to them,
however, they will SAIL some loops with very modest input energy. I
imagine I will like them a lot more when I?m 75 years old?
Fortunately, as
instructors, it?s rare that one of our students comes to us looking for advice
on casting a parabolic taper. Modern tubulars generally are not designed
with radical hinges in them.
Regards,
Troy
Miller
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~