[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
Spey class
- Subject: Spey class
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:12:30 -0400
Walter & Group...
From Will Turek :
Gordy,
Lots of great advice - especially from Rick and your comments from your and
his conversation. I agree completely. You both mentioned all the points I didn't
have time to write. However, I will share my lesson plan for a beginning spey
class.
Notes: I usually break both casts into two sessions even though only one is
listed. Smaller chunks that focus on one or two mechanical aspects of the cast.
For example, first practice session might be 15-20 min of anchor placement. Then
call back in and demonstrate what I'm seeing the group do wrong and how to
correct. Introduce another one or two aspects, clearing line and d-loop
formation, then send them out to put it all together 15-20 min. Doesn't seem
like much time, but for beginners that's plenty. Too much time = reinforcing bad
muscle memory. Also, notice I don't specifically break out the forward cast...
why? Because we are continuously working on it throughout the entire class, a
little bit at a time. I've found that focusing on it too much provides a major
distraction for students. They will naturally ask, "why isn't my line doing X on
the forward cast" all through the lesson. Having already established the
overhead and belgium cast, I can refer back to what they've already learned and
add a little tweak here and there so they progress, but don't obsess on perfect
loops. Perfecting loop formation is for more advanced classes; beginning classes
are about basic understanding, technique, and procedure. Open loops are fine
with me as long as the line lays out straight enough they can use the casts for
fishing.
Also, I intentionally insert a break between the two casts to teach an
exercise I've developed for clearing line. I let students discover and
experience clearing line on their own first. That way they begin to build their
own schema of what it is, how it looks, etc. This gives them some prior
knowledge and makes it easier to assimilate the new schema, i.e. modify their
existing scheme to account for a more efficient method taught in the exercise.
Plus, they learn an effective exercise they can practice on their own to improve
their casting outside of class. And which can be applied to ANY water bourne
anchor cast. (Perhaps I'll explain this sometime on the board, best with video
and not words though - and don't have time now).
Notice I have clear objectives for what students should be able to learn by
the end of the class. Also, my outline is bare bones which allows me some
flexibility to focus on whatever aspects of the casts is necessary depending on
physical and verbal feedback from students.
All my students receive this outline before they attend a class. Affect
clearly effects student's learning, having an outline reduces student's anxiety
by establishing clear expectations between teacher and students prior to
beginning class.
Last, notice this this 101. I have similar course outlines for intermediate,
advanced, and skill specific spey classes. All build on skills learned in lower
level classes. Together the comprise a spey casting course. The point being,
developing a logical progression of classes is just as important as a logical
progression of skills within a course. We want students to come back for more.
Controlling the flow of information (amount) and presentation (student-centered)
promotes mastery learning and facilitates development of life long learners and
clients.
I'm offering this to the group to use as a template to develop their own
courses.
W
PS. I agree with Craig 100%. From both a time management and pedagogical
perspective, I've retreated to teaching only the Circle spey and Double casts
for beginners, single hand or two-hand. For many years I tried to teach the
switch cast and single spey as well, and got far too bogged down with student's
skill levels - it's not an easy cast for most people, and therefore has the
potential to eat up a ton of time. From a pedagogical perspective, if the goal
of the class is to teach one upstream and one downstream waterbourne anchor it
is not necessary. D-loop formation and forward cast can be effectively taught
with overhead and Belgium casts. Also, allows me to devote an entire class,
intermediate, to learning airborne anchor casts - switch, single, snake.
Students already have a firm grasp of the vocabulary, mechanics, and principles
from a beginning class and catch onto the airborne anchors casts much
quicker.
"Making the simple complicated is commonplace; making the complicated simple,
awesomely simply, that's creativity".
-Charles Mingus
W
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Will .... Very clear
outline. You are right in that the "bare bones" method does allow for
flexibility.
I applaud your including time constraints for
each topic.
Your attachment is included.
One question re. your comment on the switch cast
getting you bogged down with the student's skill levels : Do you think
your student will become competent with the single Spey if he can't perform a
switch cast ?
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Gary Davison :
Gordy,
This would be my general idea on approaching the class for Spey Casting
with single handed rod.
After the terms and basic principles of the spey cast have been covered.
An important point is to make sure the equipment being used by the
student is conducive to the spey cast.
Then start with the basic roll cast and then build to a dynamic roll cast
to show the difference.
Have them make roll casts.
Make sure the students loop formations are good.
Next step would be to move on to anchor placements. Just
picking up the line and placing the anchors correctly in the water is a
challenge. Some folks can spend all day just working on this important
task.
Once good anchors have been achieved, I would personally start with the
easier sustained water borne anchor casts such as the Snap T, & the Double
Spey.
Reason being these sustained water anchor casts will allow the student to
do the cast in stages with the ability to pause in between rod
movements. This format allows the student to think about the next stage of
the cast.
Here is the example of the break down for the
Double Spey cast.
First Stage: for the student would be the Lift, then
pause, (Point P movements for the line in the water).
Second Stage: would be the anchor placement up stream,
then pause, (review placement and see if the anchor is in the correct position
for the cast).
Third Stage: would be the forward swing for the rod in a
front of the caster in a continuous accelerated sweep with gradual upward
elevation much like a spiral stair case to the stop
position which implements the dynamic D loop, then pause. (Review
the D loop formation making sure it has proper form).
Fourth Stage: is the forward cast to the target based
on the directional change required for the cast. (Review the lay out
of the loop above the water.)
Fifth Stage: is point the rod tip at the unrolling
loop to the water.
Once the students have the moves for the Double Spey down.
Have them reduce the pause time in the casting sequence as they feel
comfortable. When they begin make the cast with out very much hesitation
they begin to feel the (Waltz) rhythm! Once this is achieved
move on to the Snap T.
Stage the Snap T which is a Four Stage cast. See how they
then react. Once the student gets the feel for the cast, then they
will probably move more quickly and smoothly through the casting
sequences.
Once that has been achieved, then I would move onto the Air borne
anchor casts that take more precision and timing. Note the Air borne
anchors require good timing and good anchor placement to execute, so the pause
is not an option. Once the line is in the air your are committed to
complete the cast. Less room for errors on these casts.
Of course with the single handed rod some hauling may and will be required
to load the rod correctly on some of the casts depending on the outlay of
line being used.
This would just be my approach on the class.
I seem to have good results with this method. I have not had any
problems with teaching this both on grass or water. But I prefer
water over grass any day. Feeling the load and the importance of
correctly pulling and placing the anchor in the water is a critical element
in teaching these casts.
All the best
Gary Davison
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks, Gary.
How
do you decide on how much time to spend on each task ? (I realize you
weren't trying to send an actual class outline; rather a general
overview.)
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Rene Hesse :
Gordy & Group,
Great-Great feed back. I 'm printing this page and putting it at the
start of my class binder.
To clarify a few things; The 'box car' of a train is the mind image
that 'I' use to remember the path the rod tip should take
in stage 1 of the double spey. In the book SPEY CASTING by
S. Gawesworth he used an image of a 'room' (page 105)
to illustrate the path. I never intended to publish the class
notes so I used my own reminders.
Now on the subject of the 'White Rabbit'- I must have been reading Alice in
Wonderland and smoking a Hooka because there is only a white mouse in spey
casting and that is the spray caused by the fly line tearing out of the water on
stage 2 of the double spey....but in my mind I got the picture.
Juergen made a great point for me, and that was to write the class so
someone else could read it if I couldn't teach it.
Thank you.
To the question of the goal of the class compared to the
results. That should have changed early in the class when I
saw
the majority having difficulty with the dynamic roll. I was well in
touch with the classes progression but ended up having to ('chose to'- and
that's where the inner struggle came from) turn it into a demo, and then a basic
practice class.
I had a distorted objective based on the class pace. The point of 2-3
casts per class is wise, unless as you said it is a Demo.
Rick's point on the 'progression of casts' is spot on. They build on
each-other and that is a great way to teach it.
Craig brought up the point of the Double spey and snap T being the easiest
to teach. I had never thought of it
that way, and it makes sense. They are so cool and efficient to do
that it will hold the interest of the students to learn it.
Where the single and snake take much more timing and talent to do and they
could get frustrated.
And the last statement;6.) Critique your
own class or course. Heed feedback. Did your students really learn
to use the casts you taught ?
Amen! - I learn from the classes I teach - every time.
The guys that help me with the classes are such nice guys, they are
short with feed back, maybe for fear of hurting
my feelings. But brain storming after a class is the best way to get
better at what I enjoy.
So thank you for the feedback, I'm still looking for insights.
Regards,
Rene
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rene.... Believe me, we are
all still learning. That is what makes this stuff so great
!
RE. your "white rabbit" : Simon
Gawesworth once taught us at a conclave that if you use inappropriate power as
you come around and try to form the white mouse, it can morph into a "white
rat". If that error is even worse, why couldn't we end up with
a WHITE RABBIT ????!!!
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Attachment:
Spey 101 Intro Outline.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document