Walter & Group :-
From Walter Simberski on loop theory My brief comments in his text in blue italics..... G.
Gordy,
Have to jump in on the mass vs velocity discussion with a few
points.
We know that the snapping sound we get sometimes as the
line
unrolls is caused by the loop front breaking the sound barrier.
Note
that I said loop front - this means that the fly leg is actually
traveling at
mach 2 (assuming not shooting line). Obviously the
loop isn't starting
out that fast so it must be increasing in
velocity as it unrolls.
Good point, Walter .... the experiment which proves the point.
NOW: What would happen if we tried the
same thing with an untapered fly line (level line)
?
G.
Two things we can do to prevent this from
happening - shoot line
since this means the rod leg is moving (so it has
energy) and is
increasing in length (so it requires more energy to keep
moving
as it gets longer (ignore the fact that it slows down at the same
time)).
The second is to tie a bit of yarn onto the end of the line to
increase
air resistance and help bleed off energy.
This explains why its much easier to "crack
the whip" as you cast once you have lost your fly
! G.
On the loop
in space concept - once a loop is formed it continues to
unroll until all
energy is bled out of the system. A loop unrolls because
one leg is moving
faster than the other. If we remove all resistance
(internal and external)
from the system the line would fully unroll,
the end would kick over, and a
new unrolling loop would be formed.
If energy is conserved this would repeat
forever. If we restore internal
resistance to the system the cycle
eventually ends - with minute
imperfections in the line we end up with the
line tumbling through
space.
I'd sure like to have one of our space
station "space walkers" take a fly rod up there and test that theory. I'll
bet he'd find you are correct.
G.
Stepping away from thought experiment mode - Paul
Arden and I did a
number of experiments casting a length of line and found
that once a
loop is formed it continues to unroll until the line fully
unrolls.
One exception might well be the loop which is
formed with insufficient energy in the system to have it do so fully ... the
underpowered collapsing cast.
G.
Cheers
Walter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Ally Gowans:
Hi
Gordy,
One of the classical
reasons for seeing excessive counter flex in the line is the direction taken by
the rod tip vs the following line path. Eg it is very common for inexpert Spey
casters to take the rod forward “over the top” to make the final delivery
downwards and the likely result is that the rod tip travels almost at 90 degrees
to the following line after the stop. The rod tip should if possible travel in
the same direction as the approaching line, tangential to the D loop rather than
downwards. The downward motion is usually caused by too much upper hand pushing
and too much effort which produces a lousy stop.
Best
wishes,
Ally
Gowans
A practical point of view by Pete Greenan :-