[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
Physics /
- Subject: Physics /
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:02:19 -0500
Walter & Group...
From Rene Hesse on the physics of fly casting
:
Gordy,
The technical information in this forum is something I never studied in
college.
I have to say I'm eating it up because there is a feeling of growth
and mind expansion when I read it.
90% of the students I teach will never hear this in-depth information,
however for the one person that is as excited as I am to read and learn the
terms such as vectors-kinetic energy..., and then work the math and apply it to
fly casting.....WOW! What a blast! We can connect on a whole different
level.
Thanks,
Rene
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Walter Simberski : -
Gordy,
"2. Sometimes Server states the obvious. Physics is about stating the
obvious, proving that
the obvious is true, and building from there.
Well..... sometimes things may not be
obvious at all, yet can be proven to be
true. G."
What amazes me is the number of times the things we
think are
obvious turn out to be wrong. That's why it is so important to
identify
these things and then prove or disprove them.
Another thing
that amazes me is how often we hear a simple
concept and then think
that it should have been obvious all along.
SLP is one example,
Bruce's 6 step method is another.
Some of us love delving into the
nitty gritty physics and occasionally
this stuff is useful but it's the
simple nuggets that really advance
our skill sets as instructors. After all,
it's a rare treat to spend more
than a few minutes with a student. Being
able to pass on something
useful that is going to have long term positive
affects in that short
space is both the challenge and the
reward.
Walter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Walter....
True. Bruce's six step method works very well. A kind of
epiphany.
However, SLP (the straight line path of the
rod tip) while seemingly obvious, is (as you know) an "incomplete
truth".
An ALMOST
straight line path of the rod tip is needed to form a tight loop, true. If
the caster were able to manage an absolutely straight line path of the rod tip
throughout the entire stroke all the way to loop formation, there would
necessarily be a collision between the fly line and the rod. Most elite
casters have a little bit of convexity to the path of their rod tips as they try
to make tight loops when "straight line casting" for
distance.
Same with the
STOP. As Troy and I have pointed out before, if we really have a stop as
meaning instantaneous cessation of motion, this "brick wall" stop would yield
all sorts of problems with the cast.
Some other
parameters of casting which are seemingly "written in stone on the mount" are
open to similar challenges.
That is the
wonderful thing about fly casting. Its so "fluid" and ever changing
depending upon the caster, his equipment, his goals, and the conditions
including weather and surroundings. No two humans are built or move in
exactly the same way.
It's like the
mathemetician (you're the real thing ) trying to solve an equation with an
infinite number of variables !
I daresay,
that no two casts are ever exactly the same !
Your
statement on challenge and reward is right on
target.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~