[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
Compound-complex loops
- Subject: Compound-complex loops
- Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:52:23 -0400
Walter & Group..........
Thoughts on loops from Walter Simberski:-
Gordy
I have to say that this is what I enjoy so much
about these discussions. Just when you think you
have a concept nailed down along comes an
observation that makes you rethink everything from the basics.
In this case the concept is how we relate loops,
legs and rsp. When does the fly leg stop being the fly leg?
After the loop has completely straightened? In
one variant of a snap cast we are essentially recasting
while our initial loop is still unrolling. Is this
actually changing what happens to the fly leg or does the
first loop straighten completely which makes the
fly leg become part of the original rod leg and then become
a whole new fly leg because of the second
loop?
Taking a look at Paul Arden's home page on
Sexyloops www.sexyloops.com Paul
demonstrats a cast with two
obvious loops, a
third one just forming and a total of 4 legs. Which is/are the fly and rod
leg(s)? Is the fly leg from one loop
part of the rod leg for another loop?
I'm going to have to spend some time thinking about
this. Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
I used to think the definitions committee had a
tough task. I'm beginning to think it may more like impossible.
Cheers,
Walter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Walter......
Hopefully, the perfect fly
will never be tied. I never wish to use a fishing method which
assures a catch with every cast, either.
By the same token, one of the things I love best
about fly casting is the infathomability of all its inner secrets !
As a mathematician and physicist, I know you
understand exactly what I mean.
When we first started this Study Group, I feared
that after a year or two we'd run out of topics and our efforts would turn into
abject redundency .
NOT SO !
It appears that the more we learn, the more we find
we don't know. Certainly this has always been true of science, medicine,
and other advanced disciplines .........but flycasting
?
My, "thing" in life has been to try to stay on the
cutting edge of what endeavor I enter. Our Study Group allows us all to do
the same as we go way beyond, "test requirements" and flycasting
dogma.
Now to answer your questions as best I
can:-
1.) The beauty of definition is that
something can be what we declare it to be. In the case of the fly leg, we
may consider it no longer a, "leg" as the leader and fly enter the loop during
its final unfurl.
2.) Yes .... I think the fly leg from
one loop can form from the rod leg of another.
3. ) We can deform an already formed loop by
what we do with the fly rod during counterflex and, again, during
rebound.
We can tear it open with what we do after rebound,
or further deform it, though we can't easily change the direction of its
flight. Note the word, "easily". (Old dogma dictates that we can't
change the direction of loop flight once the loop is on its way .....
)
As with the dynamic version of the SNAP CAST, we
can make a second cast prior to the unrolling of the loop, thus violently
changing the direction of flight by 180 degrees ........ even directing the
second formed loop several degrees to either side behind the
caster.
(Dean Floyd taught me to do that as he repeatedly
made a forward cast and, then (prior to its loop fully unrolling) made a second
cast, "into it" and directed the reverse cast thus made to have the fly land
accurately to targets placed behind him on either side.)
Technically, this yields the 4 legs of
two briefly simultaneous loops !!!!
I've seen Tom White use this trick to snap a fly
back at a heckler standing behind him at a fly show whilst giving a demo.
Shuts up the heckler, and delights the crowd .
Sounds like, "trick casting"....kind of like,
"comic dancing" ..... however, I have actually used the snap cast to present to
a bonefish which comes in close behind me after I've made a forward cast to one
which didn't take. This way, I can snap one back to the new fish without
even bringing my rod up and back where a spooky fish would see it. Then,
there is the variation which yields the SNAP - T for Spey fishing.
Now, if we do the same thing but with application
of less power, we can get two loops at the same time .... one forward, and one
backward.
By altering the timing and application of
power, we can actually get two loops going in the same
direction.
Paul Arden may have some comments to help teach us
on this one........................
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~