[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • "hinging" / leaders



    Walter & Group.........

    From Bruce Richards :

    Thanks Gordy a very complete reply. I would only argue one point, and that

    is the stiffness issue. I don't think that has a place in this discussion.

    While there may be some cases where there is a significant difference in

    line stiffness, esp. between shooting head and mono shooting line, I

    contend that the even more radical difference in mass is a bigger issue.

    The biggest problem is with high density sinking heads and mono SLs. The

    problem is two-fold. First, there is no way to taper high density heads

    small enough to reduce the mass of the tip enough to prevent some line

    "kick" as the loop opens to the leader. This throws some slack into the

    line. Also, when casting with more than a small amount of overhang, there

    is another "kick" as the head reaches the loop front. Initially the loop is

    in light SL only, when the short tapered back end of the head makes the

    turn into the loop front there is a dramatic mass change that throws a

    shock wave through the loop. The heavy head doesn't like the rapid

    direction change. This throws more slack into the line, the farther this

    happens from the rod tip (the more overhang), the more severe the result.

    Those are the reasons it is very tough to cast high density heads with much

    overhang.

    The issue is the same at either end of the line. Matching mass is much more

    important than stiffness. It is easy to match line to leader butt stiffness

    with stiff, but light monofilament. The energy is contained in the moving

    mass of the line. If the mass at the transition changes dramatically, so

    will the speed. If the same energy is transferred to a lighter mass, speed

    must increase to conserve energy, which results in a big "kick", even if

    the leader butt is stiff. Regardless of stiffness, for smooth energy

    transfer there cannot be a radical change in mass. That is the reason for

    the rule stating that leader butts should be approx. 2/3 of line tip

    diameter for best performance. Nylon has a specific gravity of approx. 1.2,

    fly lines, about .85. Being more dense leader butts of 2/3 line tip dia.

    have nearly equal mass. Simple physics really, but not well understood by

    many. The most common misuse of this I see is with SW leaders. Many casters

    will use 40 lb. stiff leader butts for tarpon lines. Certainly stiff enough

    (not that that is any advantage), but not heavy enough to take the energy

    from the line so casting performance is poor. Regardless of nylon type,

    mass matching is THE key to good performance, just as it is in line design.

    The leader is nothing more than an extension of the fly line, the same

    rules apply.

    Bruce

    Scientific Anglers/3M

    4100 James Savage Rd.

    Midland, MI 48642 USA

    Tel: 989-496-1113

    Fax: 989-496-3374

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    From Jerry Puckett:

    Gordy:

     

    How does one creat more SLP of the rod tip to carry more line for distant casting?

     

    Thanks,  Jerry 

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Jerry ....   By having a good match between application of power, stroke length, rod arc and rod bend along with no side to side deviation ("tracking") .  Couple all this with smooth, constant acceleration and a crisp stop at exactly the right time and you have it.

    Sounds, "easy".... but with multiple variables, it is a tall order.  That's why only the very best casters can do it when carrying lots of line out of the rod tip, especially when a lot of overhang is involved.

    Gordy

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~