[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • TORQUE (more) / MCCI exam



    Walter & Group...........

    (Sorry for my, "typo" in our last message. The word, "phylosophy" should have been, PHILOSOPHY...... Gordy)

    From Ally Gowans :

    Hi Gordy,

     

    Another interesting aspect of torque is how the affect can be magnified or diminished by rod spine orientation. Indeed I have heard some expert casters criticise a particular blank (perhaps flawed?) claiming that it twists to the extent that it is hardly possible to cast a straight line. Also I have known of a few rods where it has been suggested that if the rings are offset to enable better shooting the blank might suffer suggesting that maybe some makers do not consider torque which in this case would be induced by the rings being offset especially during hauls.

     The really nice thing about a very relaxed (or virtually no grip) on a two handed rod is that the assemblage of rod/reel/line rotates freely in accordance with its centre of gravity and the preferred bending plane of the blank which usually results in a pure tip movement (reduced torque) and an excellent cast. (There are of course ergonomic advantages to be gained with a light hold on the rod).

    In single handed casting the result of unwanted axial torque application can be seen especially in long distance casting when the leader kicks out to the side.

     

    Best wishes,

    Ally Gowans

     

    See my web sites http://www.letsflyfish.com and http://www.flyfish-scotland.com

    2009 Spey Casting and Salmon Fishing Schools at The Kenmore Hotel March 20/22, April 17/19 and June 12/14. Trout fly fishing and fly casting school "Tackling Trout" at The Kenmore Hotel May 15/16/17, 2009.See my web sites for more details of schools.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

    Ally: 

     That makes good sense.  Of course you refer to torque in the axis of the rod.

    You make casting much easier by using an ergonomic approach.  I've learned a lot about that from you.

    Ergonomically, there is less stress on the caster who is then likelly to perform more smoothly with better control.

    Spine used to be a real problem with the early fiberglass rods and even the first generation of graphite ones.  Bamboo rods can take a, "set" resulting in unwanted static bend ..... but I never encountered a torque problem with them, even when we used them years ago in the salt water which did all kinds of nasty things to them.

    The modern fly rod blanks I've made up during the past few years have precious little spine.  In making up 4 piece rods, one might even consider carefully lining up the spines of each segment.  I've never actually done that.

    I'm glad you used the word SPINE  not "SPLINE". Many use the terms interchangably which is not correct. (Note p. 68 and p. 103 of Don Phillips', THE TECHNOLOGY OF FLY RODS )  The term, "spline" usually means a mechanical shaft with machined gear like ridges.

    Gordy

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    From Al Crise.  My comments in bold blue italics :-  

    Howdy Gordy
     The Joe Mulson Cast is a pure torque cast.
     
    When looking at last weeks text about Rotation We sometimes forget that the rod is not a stiff lever.
      I was off in the left brain area again. Looking at a Recurve bow over a straight bow. or now the Compound bows.
     They use the Wheel or Curve to move the string. We use the Bend or loading of the rod  to move the "string" This curving of the rod add speed to the fly line just line the bending of a recurve bow or the wheels of a compound bow. This Curving takes up slack and add a torque to the straight limb. Adding this give a lot of power or Line speed to the cast.
      Now if one of our Engineers can tell me the name of all the I just put down....??
     
    ol Al
     
     
    Allen R. Crise
    FFF-Master Casting Instructor
    Hawk Ridge Flycasting School

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

    Al.....    I'm not an engineer, but I do have some thoughts on your message.

    The fact that the fly rod is flexible allows it to bend as the rotational force of TORQUE is applied to the handle in the casting plane.  It is this flexibility which allows us to cast with a nearly straight line path of the rod tip despite the angular change in the position of the butt section of the rod from the start to the completion of the stroke ie., ROD ARC.

    As you well know, this application of energy causes the rod to bend as the flexible tip is moved against the inertia of the fly line.  As it bends, the rod becomes loaded whereby latent energy is stored which is then released as kinetic energy after the STOP as the rod straightens.

    I used to think that this yielded almost all the energy for propelling the unrolling loop to the target. We now know that while it is important as additive, it isn't quite as important as the amount of energy imparted to the line directly by the motion of the caster ..

    This was well described in an article by Al Kyte, entitled: SWING VS. SPRING, 2003. (I don't remember where it was published..... Don Simonson sent me a copy after the Conclave.)

    Now for the your analogy with the bow.

    Similarity:  The bowman does load the bow by bending it thus storing energy which is released as the string is released.

    Differences:  1. Torque is not used by the bowman.  (No rotational movement of the bowman's anatomy.)

                           2. Virtually all of the energy propelling the arrow comes from the release of kinetic energy as the bow unbends.  None directly from the action of the bowman after the release of the string.

    Gordy

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    On the MCCI exam by Ralph Tomaccio.  My comments in his text.    Gordy

    Hi Gordy and all,

     

    I’m glad this question came up.

     

    Your philosophy in what you feel a MCI candidate should know/do regarding areas of fly fishing the candidate has not participated in is very fair. Since there is no set list of questions in the MCI testing process, and examiners can ask whatever they want of the candidate, how likely is it that other examiners will share your philosophy to the same degree ?

    Lead examiners will differ in many ways.  I know them all and feel that basically they feel the same way.  Of course, the examiners may go beyond your knowledge of any one kind of fly fishing.  At that point, a good candidate will usually indicate that and qualify his answer or let the examiners know where he/she would go to find out the information. 

    The BASICS of each kind of fly fishing should be expected knowledge.  Here is what NOT to do: 

    A candidate who did trout as well as salt water fishing was asked to describe a basic trout leader.  His answer:  "I don't know.  I buy all my leaders ready made."  He was then asked how he would answer that if his student asked him.  His answer: "I'd send him to the fly shop to learn that."      G.

     

     Is the candidate asked his/her experience prior to testing to help determine the types of questions to be asked? i.e. if one of the examiners is a specialist in spey casting, and my experience is very limited in spey, wouldn’t that examiner have higher expectations of the candidate regarding spey and, therefore, ask more spey-type questions and/or expect a higher degree of spey casting ability than an examiner that has spent most of their time in small streams?

    This is up to the lead examiner.  I would expect, however, that it would not be omitted.  In the rare instance where that might occur, a well versed candidate can certainly make that clear.    G.

     

    Please do not misunderstand my concern of the above. I want to know as much as I possibly can about all types of fly-fishing to be as well rounded as possible. But, I also don’t like surprises and would like to possess a good understanding of the process. To me, fully knowing what is expected is part of being prepared.

    No one likes surprises when being examined. Having said that, however, a true master should be able to handle questions which are way off the beaten track ..... like, "TELL ME HOW TO FILET A SALMON".   The examiner might throw in a question like that to see how you would handle it in real life if one of your students or a CCI asked you that.    G.

     

    Regarding the non-marking of lines that would aid in the distance requirements, I agree this should not be done. But, is marking the line to indicate head length, which is something that is generally recommended, also forbidden?

    No.  We agreed that placing a mark at the base of the head would not be disallowed.  (We felt that wouldn't assist the caster with accuracy). G.

     

    Thanks,

    Ralph Tomaccio