[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • RE: Acceleration / deceleration



    Title: Message
    Walter.....
     
    Crystal clear to me, as a physics/math layman.
     
    Did Denise and Liz tell you when they plan to publish this in the Loop ?
     
    I'll archive this in my documents for future reference.
     
    I would like to do that, as well, with your Part I.  Would you be kind enough to send me that one in an attachment ??
     
    Great work !  I know how hard it is to take a subject which is second nature to you as a professional and accurately reduce the information to levels understandable to the layman.  I have that problem often as I testify as an expert witness on orthopaedic surgery issues in court or on patent infringement cases in federal court which have to do with medical devices I've invented over the years.  If I use strictly medical jargon, it is not understandable to the jury ...... and that would make my testimony ineffective.
     
    Gordy
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Walter Simbirski [mailto:simbirsw@xxxxxxx]
    Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:38 PM
    To: Gordon Hill
    Subject: Re: Acceleration / deceleration

    Gordy - Actually since you are back from vacation, here is a copy of what I submitted.
     
    Any feedback would be appreciated!
     
    Thanks
     
    Walter
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:59 PM
    Subject: RE: Acceleration / deceleration

    Walter....
     
    I won't share this one, but do appreciate it !
     
    Those articles of yours have been sorely needed.
     
    Had a great T-gvng ...... lots of family there.  Trust yours was a good one, too .  (I do remember that in Canada it is earlier.
     
    Best,
     
    Gordy
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Walter Simbirski [mailto:simbirsw@xxxxxxx]
    Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 12:28 PM
    To: Gordy Hill
    Subject: Re: Acceleration / deceleration

    Gordy - off the record for now...
     
    Been a while since I last contributed to the discussions. I've been tied up with
    putting together my latest patent submission. The simplest idea has resulted in
    a write up requiring 80 drawings (and counting). I've been reading the posts
    whenever I get a chance. Nice to see the activity level still remains high.
     
    I think you'll find the second part of my article for the Loop will cause some
    interesting discussions. I structured the article specifically for that purpose.
    Hopefully, I got it to Denise in time to include in the current installment.
    I'm getting a new appreciation for the degree of difficulty she has to
    deal with to draw each installment together.
     
    Some points that will come out from the article:
     
    For the most part whether we talk about linear or angular motion really isn't
    important. What I've alluded to in the article is that they are different frames
    of reference but either or both views can be applied whenever necessary to
    simplify the specific item we want to study or to make use of a specific source
    of information such as the casting analyzer. I didn't state that outright but
    most people should reach that conclusion without too much effort. I intend
    to put together a study regarding the affect of loop size on casting efficiency
    for a future (and much less ambitious) article to show how a knowledge of
    angular motion can be applied to simplify our understanding in this area.
     
    What is important is that the rod acts as a flexible third class lever. There
    is a very interesting analysis regarding the importance of the flexible part when it
    comes to transferring energy to the line. The math required the use of calculus
    but hopefully the analysis and conclusions will be stated clearly enough that it
    won't put people off.
     
    The part I expect to see some discussion about is the use of the rod as
    a third class lever. It is interesting to note that while the punching speed of
    an elite athlete may exceed 130 mph the average punching speed
    for a person ranges between 20 and 40 mph depending on age, gender,
    etc. At the same time the rankest newbie who picks up a fly rod is
    easily able to generate those mini sonic booms that indicates the loop
    speed has exceeded the sound barrier. And if the loop speed is
    travelling at that speed how fast is the fly leg travelling?
     
    Anyway, Gordy, I hope you and everyone else in the group has a
    great Thanksgiving! I'm looking forward to when I have more time
    available so I can take an active role in the discussion group.
     
    Cheers!
     
    Walter

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Gordy Hill <masterstudy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Date: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 7:57 am
    Subject: Acceleration / deceleration
    To: Walter Simbirski <simbirsw@xxxxxxx>

    > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not
    > understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.