[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • Haul period / Overhang



    Walter & Group.....

    From Troy Miller :-

    I very strongly disagree with this statement:

     

    If we could haul just during the recovery it would be the most effective.

     

    And the theme is repeated several times through the discussion below.  Before this becomes “fact” within instructor circles, I believe this should be validated.  I doubt it would hold up…  JMHO

     

    Regards -- TAM

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Troy....

    I've thought a lot about this and some of us have discussed it at length.

    I think the problem lies in the use of the word, RECOVERY.

    Recovery, as I see it, can be used to mean the straightening of a bent rod.  Some use it to mean the interval between maximum rod bend and RSP (rod straight position).  I think we can agree that the haul should continue through that phase. To haul, "just" during that phase works OK, but is not as efficient as performing the haul as a mirror image of the casting stroke.  Lefty used to teach to make a very brief haul during this period, but has recently changed and no longer does this.  While it does work, it is more difficult for a student to get that brief snap of a haul at just the right place, for one thing.

    Problem comes when we use the term to mean the tendency for the rod to straighten after counterflex.  Less confusion, I think, if we use the word, REBOUND to describe this.

    While most are of the opinion that the haul can be continued for a very short period of time after RSP at the start of counterflex, that doesn't mean it should be maintained all the way into rebound.  To do so would be counterproductive because it would mean pulling back on a loop which has already formed and is on its way to the target.  Certainly NOT a good idea to haul only during this phase !

    Therefore, I'd agree with you that we should not be teaching that the haul should be made during or only during recovery, since this would be confusing.

    Gordy

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    From Capt Kirk Eberhard:

    Gordy,

         A person casts a two handed rod with a matching Windcutter line (About a 54 foot head).
    A tighter loop is possible with a bit of overhand as opposed to having a portion of the head in the top rings. I suppose the latter causes more counter flex. Can a similar situation exist with your single hand rod/line experiments?
    Kirk
     
    ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
    Kirk....
     
    You are a much better two handed caster than I'll ever be, so I had detailed discussion with Rick Whorwood, who happens to be casting with me, today.  Here is what we came up with :
     
    Firstly, we think you mean to use the word OVERHANG, not, "overhand" ..
     
    With single handed casting as with two handed casting I can usually get a tight loop more easily when I carry enough line so that there is a short segment of overhang out of the rod tip when distance casting.  When, "tip casting" with a lot less line out of the rod tip, however, I have no trouble forming a tight loop .... so I guess it is situation dependent.
     
    It may be that having heavier head in the rod guides results in increased counterflex, especially when applying more power for greater distance, but I'm not certain about that.
     
    Now we can get into a discussion of just what OVERHANG is.   Simplistically, it can be seen as the length of thin running line between the rod tip and the rear of the head.  That's easy.  Problem comes when there is a long back taper.  We might argue, for example, that there is no real overhang if we consider that leaving some of the back taper out of the rod tip isn't really overhang.  Using that line of reasoning, there would be no possibility of having overhang if we are casting a CRT (continuous rear taper) line.
     
    For practical purposes, I chose to look at overhang as the distance between the rod tip and to beginning of the rear taper.
     
    Steve Rajeff has pointed out that overhang is the barometer for the rate of turnover of the head...... the longer it is, the longer it takes for the loop to unroll.... the longer it takes to unroll, the longer the cast as long as it can remain airborne.
     
    The cast falls apart when casters try to carry more overhang than they can control.  For most casters a two or three foot long overhang is all they can handle.   Some can't handle more than  that when false casting, but can achieve longer casts by shooting line on the final back cast thus increasing overhang on that one cast prior to the delivery.  Works well.
     
    Gordy