[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
More: Acceleration/ tip velocity
- Subject: More: Acceleration/ tip velocity
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:26:43 -0400
Walter & Group
:
Shane....
This is making a lot more sense, now.
I'll be interested in what you glean from the Nolan /
Bruce paper on the plotting of tip velocity.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Responding to statement 3 below. Like in my last
response to Server's point, I agree that the maximum rate of
acceleration is at the maximum load. but acceleration (increasing velocity)
is continuing to RSP at which it would be 0. Force = mass * acceleration so once
force is 0 when the rod is straight acceleration would have to be 0, but
velocity is maximum. This would be true for a simple mechanical
spring moving in a straight line. The final velocity is the mathematical
integral of the total acceleration. So even if the rate of acceleration
is decreasing (not the same a decelerating or negative acceleration), the
velocity is still increasing, just not as fast. That is it is not accelerating
as fast, but it is still accelerating up to RSP (in theory).
Anyway, I find it an interesting statement that from
experiments "the maximum rod tip velocity is between the point of maximum
rod load and the RSP, not at the RSP." I expect this is related in part to the
fact that the rod is not as simple as a linear spring (which travels in just two
dimensions), the tip is not traveling in a strictly straight line at
the final stages during turnover (turnover arc). It also may be a factor
the fact that there is a fly line attached, air friction, etc. I'd like to here
others that have insight into this and I'd like to see more experimental
data if anyone has some. I have found a different paper by Nolan and Bruce that
plots tip velocity, and am going to look at it
tonight.
Shane