[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • Tackle for Testing & Practice....Robert



     

    Walter & Group....

    Subject: Re: Tackle for testing & practice

    Gordy, Thank you for your reply;
     
    It seems that while we teach others we still have much to learn ourselves. I am curious how many rods and reels those in our group have. It seems that while I have several rods for trout that I dearly love I am always interested in finding something better. I have a 5wt. Thomas & Thomas HS905 which is a fantastic rod; a Cabellas 6wt. 9' fast tip which is also a wonderful rod, but seems to have a soft spot; a Fly Logic 6/7 wt. 9' Med-fast action; and an Echo 5wt. 9' competition casting rod. For fishing I never use the Fly Logic or Echo rods, even tho the Fly Logic with the Wulff triangular line is a decent line and is good for distance. I mostly use the Fly Logic and Echo for distance casting practice and will probably use the Fly Logic for my testing as it is a much heavier rod and I can be deadly accurate with it and hit my distance better than with the lighter rods. I've looked at the G. Loomis and Temple Fork, and still may invest in a 7wt. in the near future. The problem is that I am not near a fly shop that will allow me to test the equipment, therefore I am at the mercy of reading details out of a catalog. I do know that while I handle the lighter rods very well in the water, on land the heavier rods work best for me, and I can transfer that to my light weight rods when fishing. "Feel" seems to have a lot to do with how well I respond to a particular rod and be able to execute casts with consistency.
     
    Robert
     
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Robert...
     
    As I talk and cast with some world class casters and fly fishermen including members of the FFF Casting Board of Governors, I find that as these folks progressed they became less and less concerned with the particular rods they used and more concerned with casting techniques and fly line designs.
     
    This, I think, was due largely to their developing skills sufficient that the rods became subordinate , and partly due to the development of much better fly rods which narrowed the performance gap between high end rods and inexpensive ones.....a dramatic change, indeed, and a market trend of the future, I think.
     
    Competition distance casters do develop very strong opinions.....based upon what works best for the individual competitor.  These, however, boil down to a few rods about which most of them agree.
     
    As you have seen in our discussions, there are some really great casters who will say, "Just give me an outfit...I can cast any combination."  Even these folks, however, will have their favorites.
     
    Salt water fishermen look at the fish handling capacities of the rod as strongly as they do the casting qualities. (I have one 9 wt. TCR made up by a friend with unbelievable attention to detail such as connot be found in factory rods.  It's my favorite Permit rod.)
     
    Discussing the, "feel" of these favorites is almost like discussing the subtleties involved in wine tasting....often  an indefinable personal preference.
     
    If you wish to try many rods and have meaningful discussions about casting with them, there is, in my opinion, NO SUBSTITUTE FOR ATTENDING AN FFF CONCLAVE....PARTICULARLY THE INTERNATIONAL CONCLAVES HELD EACH YEAR.
     
    With respect to feel........Your last sentence says it all.
     
    Gordy
    -----Original Message-----
    From: robert shigley [mailto:flyfishcaneyfork@xxxxxxxxx]
    Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:17 PM