[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
  • Thread Index
  • Date Index
  • Subject Index
  • FW: Re: Re: SPLINES (SPINES)








     


    From: "JEFFERY BAREFOOT" <barefootj@xxxxxxx>
    To: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    Subject: Re: Re: SPLINES (SPINES)
    Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:29:42 -0400

    Paul,
     
            What sage does is position the sections to make the rod look the straightest.  It may have been Bill Dawson that told me that.  
     
    Jeff 
     
     
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Cc: mildbill@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; caddis@xxxxxxx ; Brydnlnims@xxxxxxxxxxx ; cezannealexander@xxxxxxxxxxx ; crazycharlie@xxxxxxx ; croberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; blacksalmon@xxxxxxxxxxx ; DermSox@xxxxxxx ; gladesflybum@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; hillshead@xxxxxxx ; iverson@xxxxxxxxx ; jfs523@xxxxxxxxxxx ; jerry_puckett2001@xxxxxxxxx ; kathleen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; thedamselfly@xxxxxxxxxxx ; plami@xxxxxxxxxxx ; ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; kerrrc@xxxxxxxxx ; simbirsw@xxxxxxx ; bobbeanblossom@xxxxxxx ; hillcathy@xxxxxxx ; donjack@xxxxxxxxxxx ; douglas.swift@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; erniemaynard@xxxxxxxxxxx ; flyfsfrank@xxxxxxx ; gregrahe@xxxxxxxxxxx ; ianmuirhead@xxxxxxx ; jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; t.maltese@xxxxxxxxx ; skifishvail@xxxxxxxx ; jfv@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; trallag@xxxxxxx ; mollysemenik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; fraudflies@xxxxxxx ; shane@xxxxxxxxx ; snowmonkey29@xxxxxxx
    Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 8:17 PM
    Subject: Re: Re: SPLINES (SPINES)

    Paul.....

    Ahhhh....yes !

                                            Gordy




     


    From: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Reply-To: "Paul Arden" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    To: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    Subject: Re: Re: SPLINES (SPINES)
    Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 07:57:36 +0100
    Hi Gordy,
    quick one on point 7, as far as I'm aware, you can only check the spine with no ringing,
    ie blank only. I don't know who spines, but I do know that Sage don't.
    Cheers,
    Paul


    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gordon Hill" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    To: <flysoup@xxxxxxxxxx>; <sobbobfish@xxxxxxx>; <rtab@xxxxxxx>; <CAPTPERMIT@xxxxxxx>; <creangler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <dwright@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <daver@xxxxxxxxxx>; <dennisg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <captdoug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <dsprague01@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <ephemera@xxxxxxx>; <brushycreekfc@xxxxxxxxx>; <keysjake@xxxxxxx>; <barefootj@xxxxxxx>; <bradyir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <flyfishar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <ken.cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <captkirk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <glbaggett@xxxxxxxxx>; <mkreider1@xxxxxxx>; <martyt@xxxxxxxxxx>; <niallogan@xxxxxxxxxx>; <pminnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <bigfly@xxxxxxxxx>; <whorwood@xxxxxxxxx>; <flycasts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <sheila@xxxxxxxxxx>; <scjacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <tharper@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <tomwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: <mildbill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <caddis@xxxxxxx>; <Brydnlnims@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <cezannealexander@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <crazycharlie@xxxxxxx>; <croberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <blacksalmon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <DermSox@xxxxxxx>; <gladesflybum@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <hillshead@xxxxxxx>; <iverson@xxxxxxxxx>; <jfs523@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <jerry_puckett2001@xxxxxxxxx>; <kathleen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <thedamselfly@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <plami@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <kerrrc@xxxxxxxxx>; <simbirsw@xxxxxxx>; <bobbeanblossom@xxxxxxx>; <hillcathy@xxxxxxx>; <donjack@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <douglas.swift@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <erniemaynard@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <flyfsfrank@xxxxxxx>; <gregrahe@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <ianmuirhead@xxxxxxx>; <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <t.maltese@xxxxxxxxx>; <skifishvail@xxxxxxxx>; <jfv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <trallag@xxxxxxx>; <mollysemenik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <fraudflies@xxxxxxx>; <shane@xxxxxxxxx>; <snowmonkey29@xxxxxxx>
    Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 6:38 PM
    Subject: FW: Re: SPLINES (SPINES)


    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > From: Walter Simbirski <simbirsw@xxxxxxx>
    > To: Gordon Hill <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    > Subject: Re: SPLINES (SPINES)
    > Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:03:56 -0600
    >
    >
    > Gordy - Putting the stiffest side of the blank on the thumb side
    >does provide the best accuracy when casting
    > for all the reasons you mention. Also when playing a fish you want
    >the stiff side on the away from the fish
    > to reduce the tendency of the rod to twist. If the rod has a
    >noticeable spine the tendency to twist can be significant
    > leading to a death grip on the rod and increased fatigue.
    > For most people (those who haven't had proper training and taken
    >the time
    > to practice) the rod will cast farther if the orientation is
    >reversed for two reasons. The obvious one is that you can load extra
    >energy into the rod on the forward cast (which is the usual casting
    >direction). The other reason is that many people do not have
    >symmetric forward and backward casts. Their back cast is
    > weaker so they are not able to make use of extra stiffness and
    >also when they do their final forward cast they tend to increase
    >their forward casting arc.
    > Walter
    > PS - the quizzes are great! Keep em coming.
    > ----- Original Message ----- From: Gordon Hill To:
    >tomw1483@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; flysoup@xxxxxxxxxx ; sobbobfish@xxxxxxx ;
    >rtab@xxxxxxx ; CAPTPERMIT@xxxxxxx ; creangler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >dwright@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; daver@xxxxxxxxxx ; dennisg@xxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >captdoug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; dsprague01@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >ephemera@xxxxxxx ; brushycreekfc@xxxxxxxxx ; keysjake@xxxxxxx ;
    >barefootj@xxxxxxx ; bradyir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; flyfishar@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >ken.cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; captkirk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >glbaggett@xxxxxxxxx ; mkreider1@xxxxxxx ; martyt@xxxxxxxxxx ;
    >niallogan@xxxxxxxxxx ; pminnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; bigfly@xxxxxxxxx ;
    >whorwood@xxxxxxxxx ; flycasts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; sheila@xxxxxxxxxx ;
    >scjacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; tharper@xxxxxxxxxxx ; tomwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    >Cc: mildbill@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; caddis@xxxxxxx ; Brydnlnims@xxxxxxxxxxx
    >; cezannealexander@xxxxxxxxxxx ; crazycharlie@xxxxxxx ;
    >croberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; blacksalmon@xxxxxxxxxxx ; DermSox@xxxxxxx
    >; gladesflybum@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; hillshead@xxxxxxx ; iverson@xxxxxxxxx
    >; jfs523@xxxxxxxxxxx ; jerry_puckett2001@xxxxxxxxx ;
    >kathleen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; thedamselfly@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >plami@xxxxxxxxxxx ; ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; kerrrc@xxxxxxxxx ;
    >simbirsw@xxxxxxx ; bobbeanblossom@xxxxxxx ; hillcathy@xxxxxxx ;
    >donjack@xxxxxxxxxxx ; douglas.swift@xxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >erniemaynard@xxxxxxxxxxx ; flyfsfrank@xxxxxxx ; gregrahe@xxxxxxxxxxx
    >; ianmuirhead@xxxxxxx ; jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; t.maltese@xxxxxxxxx
    >; skifishvail@xxxxxxxx ; jfv@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; trallag@xxxxxxx ;
    >mollysemenik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >fraudflies@xxxxxxx ; shane@xxxxxxxxx ; snowmonkey29@xxxxxxx Sent:
    >Saturday, September 03, 2005 2:37 PM
    > Subject: RE: SPLINES (SPINES)
    >
    >
    > Tom....
    >
    > I'd have agreed on that in the past. The slight softening in
    >the other direction is to be considered, also. I used to think,
    >too, that this might help tracking.
    >
    > Theoretically, if the spline is oriented on the side of the
    >caster's thumb OR directly on the opposite side....not off an some
    >other angle, it ought to help tracking, whereas if it is say 90
    >degrees off the casting rod plane, it then should provide a tendency
    >for the rod to twist on either the pickup or the forward cast. I'd
    >think THAT would lead to bad tracking of the rod tip. This is what
    >Don Phillips called an, "eccentric spine". (p 67 of his book.) The
    >articles I've read on the subject show no real agreement, however.
    >
    > Don feels that any "selective stiffening" (like with a
    >significant spline anywhere on the blank) yields a blank which is
    >basically unstable. In that case, he says, "...Unless the fly rod is
    >restrained from twisting throughout its length, the rod will tend to
    >flop over to its orientation of least resistance:..........." He
    >goes on to say that with casting, this, ".....involves repetitive,
    >reversing flexure, the rod tip oscillates from side to side during
    >the forward and rearward casting strokes as the tip twists and
    >untwists. This oscillation hurts both casting distance and
    >accuracy, since the fly line unfailingly follows the rod tip
    >motion."
    >
    > I suppose, this is the reason that modern rod makers have taken
    >pains to minimize or eleminate ANY residual spline rather than
    >taking the path of controlling its location as they did in the past
    >when the technology hadn't developed to the point of virtually
    >eliminating it.
    >
    > Don goes in to the many reasons for spline including blank void
    >inclusions, pattern edge ridge, and overall rod warp due to curing
    >with residual internal stresses, fiber-resin de-bonding, and
    >asymmetrical masses of resin. Each represents manufacturing
    >imperfection. He gives the distinct impression that any significant
    >spline at all is the result of poor blank manufacture.
    >
    > For a lot more detail, including the theory of secondary
    >splines, read his entire Chapter 7.
    >
    > Randy Swisher could probably give us the latest info from Sage
    >on this subject. I'll ask him.
    >
    >
    >Gordy
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > From: "Tom White" <tomw1483@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > To: "'Gordon Hill'" <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    > Subject: RE: SPLINES (SPINES)
    > Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 14:13:50 -0400
    >
    >
    > Gordie;
    >
    > I have a question on # 3-a&b.
    > If the "BOW" is up on a blank, and you place the guides on the
    >bottom;
    > You would have more "Power" on the pick up cast, and softer on
    >the forward cast.
    > Also better tracking on the forward cast.
    >
    > This is the way I see it. I might have mis-read this mail?
    >
    > Tom
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Capt. Tom White
    > PO Box 500085
    > Marathon, Fl. 33050
    >
    > 305-743-0055
    >
    > Cell: 305-304-8540
    >
    > tomwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx www.tomwhite.com
    >
    >
    > FFF Certified Casting Instructors Workshop (CCI)November 2005
    > FFF MASTERS Workshop November 2005
    >
    > Ascension Bay Bonefish Club Salt Water Workshop, Dec. 2005
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Gordon Hill [mailto:hillshead@xxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday,
    >September 03, 2005 1:59 PM
    > To: simbirsw@xxxxxxx; flysoup@xxxxxxxxxx; sobbobfish@xxxxxxx;
    >rtab@xxxxxxx; CAPTPERMIT@xxxxxxx; creangler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
    >dwright@xxxxxxxxxxxx; daver@xxxxxxxxxx; dennisg@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
    >captdoug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dsprague01@xxxxxxxxxxx;
    >ephemera@xxxxxxx; brushycreekfc@xxxxxxxxx; keysjake@xxxxxxx;
    >barefootj@xxxxxxx; bradyir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; flyfishar@xxxxxxxxxxx;
    >ken.cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; captkirk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
    >glbaggett@xxxxxxxxx; mkreider1@xxxxxxx; martyt@xxxxxxxxxx;
    >niallogan@xxxxxxxxxx; pminnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; bigfly@xxxxxxxxx;
    >whorwood@xxxxxxxxx; flycasts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; sheila@xxxxxxxxxx;
    >scjacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx; tharper@xxxxxxxxxxx; tomwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    > Cc: mildbill@xxxxxxxxxxxx; caddis@xxxxxxx;
    >Brydnlnims@xxxxxxxxxxx; cezannealexander@xxxxxxxxxxx;
    >crazycharlie@xxxxxxx; croberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
    >blacksalmon@xxxxxxxxxxx; DermSox@xxxxxxx; gladesflybum@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
    >hillshead@xxxxxxx; iverson@xxxxxxxxx; jfs523@xxxxxxxxxxx;
    >jerry_puckett2001@xxxxxxxxx; kathleen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
    >thedamselfly@xxxxxxxxxxx; plami@xxxxxxxxxxx;
    >ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kerrrc@xxxxxxxxx; bobbeanblossom@xxxxxxx;
    >hillcathy@xxxxxxx; donjack@xxxxxxxxxxx; douglas.swift@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
    >erniemaynard@xxxxxxxxxxx; flyfsfrank@xxxxxxx; gregrahe@xxxxxxxxxxx;
    >ianmuirhead@xxxxxxx; jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; t.maltese@xxxxxxxxx;
    >skifishvail@xxxxxxxx; jfv@xxxxxxxxxxxx; trallag@xxxxxxx;
    >mollysemenik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
    >fraudflies@xxxxxxx; shane@xxxxxxxxx; snowmonkey29@xxxxxxx
    > Subject: Re: SPLINES (SPINES)
    >
    >
    > Walter....
    >
    > This is by far the best set of answers I got !
    >
    > As far as I know, the only rods which were made without any
    >spline, were the tubular metal rods, including the beryllium copper
    >step-tapered fly rods of 1940.
    >
    > I consulted Jeffrey L. Haton's new book, "ROD CRAFTING, A FULL
    >COLOR PICTORIAL AND WRITTEN HISTORY FROM 1843 - 1960", since he had
    >many examples of greenheart and other composite wood fly
    >rods.....but found no mention of splines.
    >
    >
    >Gordy
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > From: Walter Simbirski <simbirsw@xxxxxxx>
    > To: Gordon Hill <hillshead@xxxxxxx>
    > Subject: Re: SPLINES (SPINES)
    > Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:48:06 -0600
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    >
    > From: Gordon Hill
    > To: flysoup@xxxxxxxxxx ; sobbobfish@xxxxxxx ; rtab@xxxxxxx
    >; CAPTPERMIT@xxxxxxx ; creangler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >dwright@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; daver@xxxxxxxxxx ; dennisg@xxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >captdoug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; dsprague01@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >ephemera@xxxxxxx ; brushycreekfc@xxxxxxxxx ; keysjake@xxxxxxx ;
    >barefootj@xxxxxxx ; bradyir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; flyfishar@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >ken.cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; captkirk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >glbaggett@xxxxxxxxx ; mkreider1@xxxxxxx ; martyt@xxxxxxxxxx ;
    >niallogan@xxxxxxxxxx ; pminnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; bigfly@xxxxxxxxx ;
    >whorwood@xxxxxxxxx ; flycasts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; sheila@xxxxxxxxxx ;
    >scjacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; tharper@xxxxxxxxxxx ; tomwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    > Cc: mildbill@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; caddis@xxxxxxx ;
    >Brydnlnims@xxxxxxxxxxx ; cezannealexander@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >crazycharlie@xxxxxxx ; croberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >blacksalmon@xxxxxxxxxxx ; DermSox@xxxxxxx ;
    >gladesflybum@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; hillshead@xxxxxxx ; iverson@xxxxxxxxx ;
    >jfs523@xxxxxxxxxxx ; jerry_puckett2001@xxxxxxxxx ;
    >kathleen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; thedamselfly@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >plami@xxxxxxxxxxx ; ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; kerrrc@xxxxxxxxx ;
    >simbirsw@xxxxxxx ; bobbeanblossom@xxxxxxx ; hillcathy@xxxxxxx ;
    >donjack@xxxxxxxxxxx ; douglas.swift@xxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >erniemaynard@xxxxxxxxxxx ; flyfsfrank@xxxxxxx ; gregrahe@xxxxxxxxxxx
    >; ianmuirhead@xxxxxxx ; jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; t.maltese@xxxxxxxxx
    >; skifishvail@xxxxxxxx ; jfv@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; trallag@xxxxxxx ;
    >mollysemenik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ;
    >fraudflies@xxxxxxx ; shane@xxxxxxxxx ; snowmonkey29@xxxxxxx
    > Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 3:32 PM
    >
    > Subject: SPLINES (SPINES)
    >
    >
    > Hi, Group....
    >
    > Let's discuss the fly-rod SPLINE. (Some, such as Don
    >Phillips, prefer to call it the SPINE.)
    >
    > 1.) What is it ?
    >
    > Due to manufacturing issues graphite blanks do not come with
    >perfectly uniform walls. Grpahite comes in long
    >
    > thin strands which are packed around a scrim wrapped arbor.
    >The whole is then wrapped with cellophane and
    >
    > then hardened chemically and with heat to create a rod
    >blank. During the process the arbor/scrim combination
    >
    > will not be perfectly centered in the graphite blank. The
    >result is that one side if the rod will be a bit stiffer than
    > the other sides. This can be felt by bending the rod and
    >then rolling it while it is bent.
    >
    >
    > 2.) On which side of the blank do most rod manufactures
    >place it as they make up a rod ?
    >
    > Most rod manufacturers actually look for the orientation in
    >which the rod is straightest when sighted down
    >
    > the length of the rod. This makes it easier to align the
    >guides when wrapping the rod. This is generally
    >
    > assumed to be the stiffest side of the rod but may not
    >coincide with the spine as identifed in the
    >
    > previous answer.
    >
    >
    > Another test for rod spine is to stand the blank section up
    >perpendicular with one end resting on the floor.
    > If you press straight down on the other end of the blank
    >section it will consistently bend in one direction.
    > This will tend to agree with the spine identified by
    >straightness.
    >
    > Guides are usually lined up with the stiff side of the blank
    >or opposite the stiff side. (Some rod builders will
    >
    > align the guides at 90 degrees to the stiff side of the
    >blank but usually it is on or opposite the stiff side).
    >
    > Lining up the guides on the stiff side gives the fastest rod
    >action but the rod may twist in some cases and a
    >
    > ffect casting accuracy or the action of the rod when playing
    >a fish. Putting the guides on the opposite side
    > will make the rod a bit slower but it tends to cast more
    >accurately and doesn't roll or twist when playing a fish.
    >
    >
    > With the tendency towards faster rods most rod manufacturers
    >place the guides on the stiffest side of the
    > blank as identified by blank straightness or the test
    >described two paragraphs earlier (i.e. not the test
    >
    > described in question 1)
    >
    > 3.) What is its effect ?
    >
    > a. In picking up line for a back cast?
    >
    > Following the guides on the stiff side scenario this would
    >make the rod slightly slower on the back
    >
    > cast. This would make the pick up less noisy on the water.
    >
    > b. In making a forward cast. ?
    >
    > Maximum stiffness in the direction of the forward cast would
    >maximize energy transfer and distance. A lot
    >
    > of people like to turn the rod 90 degrees when casting to
    >avoid line slap and/or for biomechanical reasons
    >
    > so the spine will not be providing them any benefit.
    >
    > 4.) Does placement of the spline (spine) have any effect
    >on tracking ?
    >
    > Not of the rod hand but it can improve tracking of the rod
    >tip.The amount of the effect depends on the difference
    >
    > between the spine and the rest of the rod.
    >
    > 5.) You have two graphite fly rods. Both are
    >top-of-the-line rods made by a well reputed rod company. One was
    >purchased 15 years ago.....you bought the other yesterday.
    >
    > Question: Is there likely to be any difference in the
    >splines (spines) between these two rods ?
    >
    > Yep - improvements in manufacturing methods has reduced the
    >erratics in the wall thickeness. This makes the spine
    >
    > less noticeable. Some manufacturers claim a Uniform Wall
    >Thickness but from what I've seen a perfectly uniform wall
    >
    > every time is still not guaranteed.
    >
    > 6.) Do most bamboo rods have a defined spline ?
    >
    > Yes. Bamboo rods are typically made up of 6 triangular
    >pieces resulting in a hexagonal cross section. While the rod
    >builders
    >
    > do everything they can to have uniform stiffness in each of
    >the 6 pieces there will be discrepancies introduced by growth
    >
    > rings etc.
    >
    >
    > 7.) How do you find it ?
    >
    > I know of 4 methods. 3 I've already described. The 4th one I
    >know of is to suspend the blank horizontally at the butt end.
    >
    > A small weight is attached to the tip end and then the blank
    >is rotated. The spine is identified when minimal deflection is
    >
    > found in the blank.
    >
    > Two good references for this information, are Dale Clemens
    >book on rod building, and Don Phillips, "The Technology of fly
    >Rods".
    >
    >
    >Gordy
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > << image001.jpg >>
    >