RE: Stop paper version 2

Title: Message

Walter...

 

I agree with you all the way.

 

The paper will be met with antagonism and skepticism if we don't carefully talk about the value of continuing to use the term STOP as a teaching tool as well as the things a true STOP can do such as forming a platform, etc., etc.

 

Gordy

-----Original Message-----
From: Walter Simbirski [mailto:simbirsw@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:13 PM
To: Gordon Hill; 'Gordy Hill'; Ssadik1@xxxxxxx; 'Jason Borger'
Subject: Re: Stop paper version 2

Do we want to add anything to this paper? It seems somewhat simplistic at this point but my opinion

is that we should not dilute the basic concept with other stuff. I think this is going to be a bit of a change

for some people.

 

Gordy also raised an excellent point today in his study group regarding the usefulness of "the stop" as a

teaching tool. I think with a bit of discussion people will realize that we are not advocating getting rid of

the stop as a teaching aid or as a stylistic element with many useful benefits.

 

I think a second paper discussing some of the implications would be a good way to go.

 

Thanks

 

Walter

----- Original Message -----

From: Gordon Hill

To: 'Walter Simbirski' ; 'Gordy Hill' ; Ssadik1@xxxxxxx ; 'Jason Borger'

Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 9:55 AM

Subject: RE: Stop paper version 2

Walter, Server & Jason....

 

I've spent some time going over the wording of this paper and find nothing which fails to fit my own concepts. 

 

The format looks OK to me.  I could find not spelling errors or problems with language.

 

Best,

 

Gordy

-----Original Message-----
From: Walter Simbirski [mailto:simbirsw@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 3:27 AM
To: Gordy Hill; Ssadik1@xxxxxxx; Jason Borger
Subject: Stop paper version 2

I've done some clean up on and simplification of the stop paper and attached it for your perusal.

 

Thanks

 

Walter