[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thread Index
Date Index
Subject Index
Answers / Loop legs / Tails / Direction
- Subject: Answers / Loop legs / Tails / Direction
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:01:32 -0500
Walter & Group...
Bruce Richards' comments on Craig Buckbee's
answers:
Gordy,
Excellent answers, but I'd mark him down just slightly for his last
two
answers, depending on his definition of "stop". More correctly he
could
have stated tip path prior to and after
"loop formation". To me, the
"stop" is rod butt deceleration following
acceleration, not just RSP. But
if his definition of "stop" is where rod TIP
deceleration starts, he is
correct.
It is an interesting concept, rod butt angular acceleration
is
decreasing while rod tip speed is increasing at the same time.
Bruce
Scientific Anglers/3M
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bruce... I had interpreted Craig to
mean where tip deceleration begins (at RSP). Of course, the tip
really doesn't actually stop at RSP, but starts to decelerate as the
rod goes in to counterflex. The term "loop formation" would indeed have
covered it since RSP is the point at which loop formation
begins.
Your CA studies have shown, as you stated in your
last sentence, that rod tip speed is greatest in the 0.1 sec. between
the STOP (rapid negative acceleration) of the hand and rod butt and RSP..... yet
acceleration of the rod tip has not changed. That concept is hard
for many to grasp.
To the caster or especially the casting student,
what happens between those two points over only a tenth of a second doesn't mean
much if anything at all. To the physicist or the person studying
the in depth details of casting mechanics, it means a great deal ....
because so much is happening during that brief
interval.
I had asked for SHORT ANSWERS. If I'd asked
Craig that on an MCCI exam, I'd have followed up by requesting more
detail. I think you would have done the same. I'll bet he'd have
been right on target.
Gordy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Walter Simberski . My comments in
bold blue italics G. :
Gordy,
If we accept the idea that loops can have parallel
legs when viewed from one direction but not be parallel when viewed
from
another direction then we have to also accept the
fact that a loop that looks like it has parallel legs may be
tailed.
True, unless an actual
collision occurs as the fly leg crosses the rod leg.
G.
I've observed that when people cast "Lefty" style
the loops may look tailed when viewed from the side but when viewed
from
the front or back they look parallel. If the amount
of line carried is significant then the affect of gravity begins to take
hold
and these loops will begin to look slightly askew
even when viewed from front or back. If these loops were viewed from a location
that was perpendicular to the casting plane then they would still look parallel.
Yes. Really depends
upon the position of the observer relative to the loop plane. (Like Einstein's
gedenken experiment with the bullet and the ascending elevator. (A bullet
shot through the elevator travels in a straight line as seen from the
outside. To a person in the rising elevator, it appears to take a
curved path. )
With respect to causing a tailing loop by
underpowering the cast this actually takes a fairly practised hand to
accomplish.
Once the loop is formed energy is being transferred
to the fly leg from the rod leg so the fly leg will tend to remain in
motion
even as the rod leg is collapsing. When observing an underpowered cast is that as the loop begins to collapse is that the rod
leg sags and drops to the ground while the fly leg continues on. Getting the two legs
to cross before the rod leg falls all the way
to the ground is not
as easy as it sounds.
Trick is to not change
the casting plane as you do this. Still not easy !
G.
This is one way to create a tailing loop even when
the path of the rod tip is convex. According to Mac Brown's book we should
also
be able to cause a tailing loop with a convex path
by changing casting planes, i.e. a low rear trajectory followed by a low forward
trajectory. Again, a difficult thing to accomplish
in real life.
Here, again, if you wish
to duplicate the tails depicted in Mac's BOX DIAGRAMS, it is best to not change
casting planes between the back cast and the forward cast.
*
I believe we discussed the idea of creating a
tailing loop with a convex path at the Conclave in Whitefish and the concensus
was
that this could be accomplished by allowing an
excessive pause at the end of the cast, so that the line falls after
unrolling, and then
trying to maintain the original or a lower line
plane on the reverse cast.
We did. We also
performed this. G.
This brings up the question of whether a tailing
loop requires the rod and fly legs to cross twice or if once is sufficient. If
we look
at what happens during a false cast we have to
compensate for gravity which means that to keep our legs parallel to the
ground
we actually have to cast slightly upwards. This
would mean that a concave rod tip path actually crosses the ideal slp twice
so
a tailing loop caused by a concave path should
cross twice.
I'll have to think about
that one after another cup of coffee. At first blush, I think you may be
right.
My very wordy 2 cents worth.
Hope the hand is better. (Doing fine !)
Walter
* CASTING ANGLES, Mac
Brown, pp. 96-107.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Lefty
Kreh...
Gordy--as usual interesting.
About the bullet
statement--and I may have been the first to use that--thinking it will impress
the student about how carefully they must stop the rod in the desired direction.
I shall continue to use it, since it seems to be effective instructions..
What I have said
and written and still believe is THE
LINE GOES IN THE DIRECTION THE TIP STOPS OR STRAIGHTENS.
When casting we
do a lot of things to alter where the leader and fly go: curve cast, tuck cast,
which is simply a vertical curve cast, snap cast, mending the line in mid-air,
etc. But I believe that once the rod tip stops we have directed the line in that
direction. None of the casts
mentioned above were possible unless the rod was stopped in the proper
direction.
Lefty
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~